Whether he’s sitting out in the open or speeding in with the ball, Jasprit Bumrah has continued to be the focal point of discussions. Questions have followed the decision like shadows ever since it was announced that he will only play in three of the five Test matches in the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy, a cautious approach to conserve his body following his back injury in Australia. Was the plan inflexible? Who made the decisions? Additionally, there were expectations that he would play in the series decider because the series was at stake at The Oval and India had only bowled once in Manchester.
After making his allotted number of appearances, Bumrah was once more not present.
The noise was recognised by India’s batting coach Ryan ten Doeschate, who described it as a “complex issue” but denied that Bumrah was picking and choosing games. He did say he would play three games, you know. Which three he played was up to us. On Thursday, July 31, ten Doeschate stated, “We have attempted to control the situation.”
In the wicket-taking rankings, Bumrah is only surpassed by Ben Stokes with 14 wickets from three games, including two five-fers, and an average of 26. However, he has bowled 119.2 overs in those three games, which is a significant amount of work on largely level grounds. Even though he has bowled around 40 overs each Test, he has only been 19 overs short of Mohammed Siraj, who has been overworked in all four Tests thus far, highlighting India’s reliance on him. According to Ten Doeschate, the team management believed it was critical to honour his physical condition.
“You know, we obviously want to wheel him out, but we also want to respect where his body’s at,” said ten Doeschate. We simply believed that it wasn’t worth adding him to the team [XI] for the Oval Test based on that. He has bowled a lot of overs, you know. Given that he has only participated in three Test matches and bowled in a single innings in Manchester, I am aware that it doesn’t always seem that way.
He has bowled a lot of overs, though, if you look at the loads. Additionally, he stated before the tour that he would be available for three games. And we simply thought it was appropriate to answer that call.”
The jigsaw-like technique used to decide which three Test matches Jasprit Bumrah will play was revealed by Ten Doeschate. For example, Bumrah was rested for the second Test match even though India was behind 1-0 and Headingley and Edgbaston were separated by a full week. Instead, he went back to Lord’s, forcing the management to choose between The Oval and Old Trafford for his last performance.
Yes, I have mentioned piecing together the puzzles each time I have responded to this question. When we didn’t play him in the third [second] Test, the boys were confused,” ten Doeschate remarked. “And we thought that, while The Oval does have bounce, it’s usually a really excellent wicket to bat on. And we reasoned that we would have bowled if we had won the toss if we had thrown the dice in Manchester. Looking back, you wish he had been present. However, you would have also claimed that we didn’t use him there if we had lost 3-1.
“So, instead of making assumptions, we’re attempting to predict the future and then determine how we can handle him. With the best bowling wicket left for the final test after he had played three, perhaps England has it exactly right.
Bumrah has not been the only subject of the balancing act. Ten Doeschate stated that his rotation had a broader effect on the group, influencing other people’s rhythm.
“It’s not the best. I suppose it’s crucial to pay attention to the men who aren’t playing, especially when you’re carrying eighteen,” he added. “Tell them that you’re acting honestly and in the team’s best interests while making decisions. In addition, all of the men who haven’t played have been outstanding. The home has been trained down by them. When they are excluded, they feel let down. When they’re with the ensemble, they don’t show it, which is crucial for fostering a positive environment in which the guys playing can perform.”
Chris Woakes’s shoulder dislocation issue
Although Jasprit Bumrah’s absence was necessary for preservation, England might now have to play the rest of the Test without their own workhorse. On Day 1 at The Oval, Chris Woakes, who has bowled the most overs (181 overs) in this series, appeared to have dislocated his shoulder. Overnight, scans will be performed to determine the exact extent of the damage.
In the 57th over of India’s opening innings, the injury happened. With a diving attempt close to the ropes, Woakes, who was positioned at mid-off, was able to grab the ball back after chasing down a strong drive. However, he fell clumsily and grasped his shoulder in obvious discomfort right away. As England physio Ben Davies hurried out, India’s hitters Karun Nair and Sai Sudharsan paused after running three, realising how serious the situation was. Davies quickly assessed Woakes on the pitch, fashioned a makeshift sling from his jumper and then escorted him off for additional testing.
“I don’t know too much about it, but it doesn’t look great,” Gus Atkinson’s statement states. “It’s very unfortunate when somebody gets hurt in the final game of the series. I hope it’s not too horrible and that everyone will support him no matter what.”
Woakes, who has played in all of the Test matches in the series and claimed 11 wickets at an average of 52.18, is now shorthanded for the rest of the match. Woakes’ lower-order runs on a challenging pitch will be much missed by England, but Gus Atkinson is prepared to take on the additional bowling strain.
“Yes, I feel fantastic and refreshed. “I can push the boundaries a little because I know I only have this one game left,” Atkinson remarked.
Home